Tuesday 22 November 2011, 6.00pm - 7.15pm
The British Academy, 10-11 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AH
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0784d/0784d6c98693642cc61ec6766fdd9b151983564e" alt=""
The lecture will look at the merits and demerits of Thomas Harriott, André Thevet and Jean de éry as scientific reporters and at the inter-relationship between the religious position they adopted and their approaches to the study of natural history. It will argue that Jean de Léry’s, Histoire d’un voyage(1578) can be considered as much a Calvinist polemic and a logical extension of the same author’sHistoire memorable de la ville de Sancerre (1574), as the landmark contribution to scientific writing it is usually represented as. It will contend that the enominalization of scientific reportage was consolidated by America by Theodore de Bry in 1591 and was not neutralized until Hans Sloane began to publish at the outset of the eighteenth century.
About the speaker
Nicholas Canny is a Member of the Scientific Council of the European Research Council. He was Director of the Moore Institute for Research in the Humanities at the National University of Ireland, Galway, 2000-11 where he was Professor of History 1979-2009. He served as President of the Royal Academy 2008-11. An expert on early modern history broadly defined, he edited the first volume ofThe Oxford History of the British Empire and with Philip D.Morgan, The Oxford Handbook of the Atlantic World, c1450-c1850 (2011). His major book is Making Ireland British, 1580-1650 (2001). He is currently engaged on a comparison between English and French writings on the Natural History of America, 1580-1720.
6.00pm-7.15pm, followed by a reception. Registration is not required for this event. Seats will be allocated on arrival.